The concept of "resistance" is gradually entering politics, research, and practical endeavors regarding children living in (post) conflict regions. While resistance theory increasingly recognizes the systematic nature of the concept, most research and interventions for war-affected children follow a highly individualized approach. In this article, we study the use of unique modern concepts and errors in the field of children and armed conflicts, and course identifies, responsible and themselves -and of course help interrelated ideas. Researchers, coaches, and politicians encourage to think about politically related approaches, and in other positions the importance of reforming macro static agents, which are highly linked to the features of this failure. In response to this critical analysis, a relational approach to the resistance of war-affected children was developed. This approach encompasses individual, collective, organizational, and political spheres of influence and emphasizes the importance of relational dynamics that facilitate exchange within and between those spheres.

Regardless of the number and intensity of stressful experiences, most returning employees and their families must successfully recover. However, you should not expect even someone who has learned resilience skills in conflict to come home easily or emotionally. The first return home is full of joy, but it is normal to experience mild to moderate symptoms of depression, anxiety, and anger for days or weeks. For example, a child who has been convinced that a parent or sibling has returned safely may now feel abandoned and may express negative feelings about the fear or anger he or she has experienced.

Getting treatment can be one of the quickest methods to recover control and balance if you and your family are still experiencing negative coping symptoms like tension, anxiety, or frustration. Many people find that their ability to endure helps them go home. However, the assistance of a qualified mental health expert, such as a psychologist, can help ease the problems of returning home for families and people who are unable to conduct the activities of daily living due to stress or trauma.

Finding specific elements that increase the possibility of a successful psychological recovery from war trauma appears to be the primary focus of quantitative research on resilience. The development of therapies aimed at post-traumatic lifestyle risk factors like domestic and community violence would be significantly impacted by this. Although "repayment agents" employ big models of children and teenagers in many companies and provide statistical support for this task, the concept, expression, and measures (from a cultural and socially political standpoint) are not taken into consideration. The use of a combination of graphical cultural instruments and long-form approaches, as well as analyzing the components of his experience through an open inquiry, present issues for future research since they give him a personality that is both dynamic and static.

Qualitative studies of resistance during the war appear to have largely addressed the conceptual and methodological flaws of quantitative methodologies. There is evidence that studies have examined features of resilience that are difficult to quantify using psychometry or to comprehend as a separate concept. These elements encompass the concepts of hope, dignity, respect for human life, choice, and purpose. Therefore, in addition to individual, family, and group therapy, a comprehensive intervention approach to strengthening resilience should include strategies to raise hope through improving living conditions and fostering social cohesion. The intricacy of the notion of resistance and the practical difficulties of doing research in conflict situations have thus been better understood thanks to the use of quantitative and qualitative approaches in the field. Comprehensive, culturally acceptable, and non-intrusive evaluation techniques must, nevertheless, overcome inherent methodological obstacles.